It's one of my favorite commercials! Fuh-huh-hun-neeee.
Love the look on the guy's face at the end... that little grin....
Sunday, August 30, 2015
How a Liar Lies, Part ... I've Lost Count
De'Stroy has written an entire post about little ol' moi... What it's about and why s/he is paying attention to me isn't really important (except to say that I'm one of his/her few targets who pays any attention to him/her). I just want to point out the manipulative language this propagandist uses ... for your education. Sez he (or she, as the case may be):
Now, I need to explain a couple of other things to De'Stroy that s/he apparently doesn't know and can't figure out ... Of course, I don't expect De'Stroy to understand any of this. Floggers, anti-Confederates, self-styled "anti-racists" and so forth do not understand that how they define certain words and terms, like racism/racist, hate, etc., is very different from how conservatives and heritage folks define them. Thus, when I say "racism" and when De'Stroy says "racism" its a safe bet that we aren't talking about the same thing.
In any case, in my view, hate is not an emotion, like strong dislike or anger, but an attitude of wishing harm upon someone, and includes a willingness to bring about that harm if the opportunity arises. Thus, a hate group exists to be AGAINST someone or members of some group, to wish harm to come to them, and to be willing to bring harm to them, if possible.
To be FOR someone or some group -- to be an advocacy force for them -- is not hate. If it was, the NAACP would be a hate group.
Unless things have changed since the last I knew of it, even after it radicalized, the League was FOR white people (they say for white Southerners), not against others. Even the "built-in aversion to non-whites" that was exhibited by the new white nationalist "youth brigade" invading the League is not automatically a desire for harm to come to non-whites, or a willingness to bring it about.
There may be some individual members who have this attitude, but as far as I can tell, it is not an official League position. Granted, I haven't paid a lot of attention to the League since its radicalization -- unlike De'Stroy, I don't obsessively comb the Internet looking for information about the League -- but if the League ever shifts its emphasis from independence for the South and advocacy for white Southerners to enmity for other groups, including actively working for their harm, then I will consider them a hate group and censure them accordingly.
Some patriotic folks in Southern heritage vehemently denounce the League because of its disapproval of the US military's missions abroad, or because of the government's corruption, or because of society's degeneracy (think Hollywood filth, the worship of death in popular music, Planned Parenthood selling body parts of aborted babies, the sexualizing of children, the abandonment of education in our schools for the purpose of embracing social manipulation, the hostility toward Christianity, the flouting of law by favored groups or individuals). Unfortunately, the League is right about many of these things, and a day is rapidly approaching when patriotism will be a vain and empty emotion; and in any case, the League's disapproval of the country's deterioration is not a hate-group characteristic.
Remember, De'Stroy defines certain words and phrases very differently than I do. Thus, when I say "hate" and when De'Stroy says "hate" its a safe bet that we aren't talking about the same thing.
This is quite possibly the first time many people will have read this thread. It's no secret that Connie Chastain was at different times a full fledged member of the hate group the League of the South.I've never been a member of any hate group. The League of the South was not a hate group when I was a member, and the jury is still out on whether it a hate group now. The entity who gave it that label, the Southern Poverty Law Center, is more like a hate group than the League was.
Chastain has admitted that she was once a member of the group.Ah, no. I have acknowledged it. "Admitted" carries the idea that it is something one would rather not acknowledge but must. I have no problem acknowledging that I was a member of the League -- twice.
She is quick however to point out that she is no longer a member,More manipulative language. "Quick to point out..." implies I'm eager to get the information out. This, of course, is not true. I have never been "quick to point out" that I'm no longer a member. I have just stated I'm not a member.
...and at different times will say that she does not support their White Supremacist ideology, sometimes.What I have said is, "... I have watched from a distance as the League has continued to radicalize, to accept the influence of white nationalists masquerading as Southern nationalists and to slowly develop a an indifference to Southern tradition and Christianity....Basically, what you have here is people who claim to love the South and its people and want to see them free -- or preserved, depending on who's talkin'. But what they really love is whiteness, which includes a built-in aversion to non-whiteness ... and any Southerners who don't share their dedication to whiteness are heaped with scorn and derision.....
At some point, the two "parted ways". You may not know that Chastain and White Nationalist Brad Griffin have also had what would seem to be a rather contentious relationship through the years as well.We have no relationship at all.
This chat is part of the reason why. Without further ado, for your reading enjoyment, the birth of the modern day Cuckfederate movement:There is no Cuckfederate movement. That term is the concoction of people who have to put others down -- like you and Simpson -- to try to make their own positions feel more secure, more right.
Now, I need to explain a couple of other things to De'Stroy that s/he apparently doesn't know and can't figure out ... Of course, I don't expect De'Stroy to understand any of this. Floggers, anti-Confederates, self-styled "anti-racists" and so forth do not understand that how they define certain words and terms, like racism/racist, hate, etc., is very different from how conservatives and heritage folks define them. Thus, when I say "racism" and when De'Stroy says "racism" its a safe bet that we aren't talking about the same thing.
In any case, in my view, hate is not an emotion, like strong dislike or anger, but an attitude of wishing harm upon someone, and includes a willingness to bring about that harm if the opportunity arises. Thus, a hate group exists to be AGAINST someone or members of some group, to wish harm to come to them, and to be willing to bring harm to them, if possible.
To be FOR someone or some group -- to be an advocacy force for them -- is not hate. If it was, the NAACP would be a hate group.
Unless things have changed since the last I knew of it, even after it radicalized, the League was FOR white people (they say for white Southerners), not against others. Even the "built-in aversion to non-whites" that was exhibited by the new white nationalist "youth brigade" invading the League is not automatically a desire for harm to come to non-whites, or a willingness to bring it about.
There may be some individual members who have this attitude, but as far as I can tell, it is not an official League position. Granted, I haven't paid a lot of attention to the League since its radicalization -- unlike De'Stroy, I don't obsessively comb the Internet looking for information about the League -- but if the League ever shifts its emphasis from independence for the South and advocacy for white Southerners to enmity for other groups, including actively working for their harm, then I will consider them a hate group and censure them accordingly.
Some patriotic folks in Southern heritage vehemently denounce the League because of its disapproval of the US military's missions abroad, or because of the government's corruption, or because of society's degeneracy (think Hollywood filth, the worship of death in popular music, Planned Parenthood selling body parts of aborted babies, the sexualizing of children, the abandonment of education in our schools for the purpose of embracing social manipulation, the hostility toward Christianity, the flouting of law by favored groups or individuals). Unfortunately, the League is right about many of these things, and a day is rapidly approaching when patriotism will be a vain and empty emotion; and in any case, the League's disapproval of the country's deterioration is not a hate-group characteristic.
Remember, De'Stroy defines certain words and phrases very differently than I do. Thus, when I say "hate" and when De'Stroy says "hate" its a safe bet that we aren't talking about the same thing.
Saturday, August 29, 2015
Congrats to the Southern Strong Group
Reports and pics of Saturday's 100-mile run are starting to show up on the group's Facebook page. I wasn't able to make the run, but I was there in spirit.
Write up in the Northwest Florida Daily News a few days before the run:
And a fantastic pic -- just one of many fantastic pics on Facebook.
Write up in the Northwest Florida Daily News a few days before the run:
Shortly after the Pensacola run on July 19, people began asking when there would be another run. And thanks to the success of that one, and this one, there will no doubt be others. But hand in hand with runs and rallies goes the behind-the-scenes work of contacting elected officials and other community leaders to stress the importance of correctly understanding our heritage, and to stop the erasure of Confederate flags, monuments, street and park names, etc., because of a false, fabricated connection to a heinous crime.
Keep standing Southern Strong, Northwest Florida!
Keep standing Southern Strong, Northwest Florida!
Flag #4 Goes Up in Danville
The peppering continues....
Video of WSET news report on flag dedication in Danville. Click the link below the image to see the video.
Congrats, Virginia Flaggers. And when sullen and disapproving naysayers claim they aren't impressed with your big memorial flags flying beside busy thoroughfares, don't you believe it. If they didn't care, they wouldn't mention it.
Video of WSET news report on flag dedication in Danville. Click the link below the image to see the video.
Congrats, Virginia Flaggers. And when sullen and disapproving naysayers claim they aren't impressed with your big memorial flags flying beside busy thoroughfares, don't you believe it. If they didn't care, they wouldn't mention it.
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
YES!
From The Smoking Gun
AUGUST 24--The man who was filmed tearing down a Confederate flag
hanging outside a Florida residence has been arrested on theft charges,
according to police who have yet to collar the alleged thief’s
videographer/getaway driver.
Dejerrian Dequan Murray, 24, was busted last week in connection with the July 11 flag theft at the Bradenton home of Robin Eaker, a 57-year-old Tropicana employee. Murray was charged with misdemeanor theft and freed on $2000 bond, according to court records. Entire report here.
Since some of the floggers have professed to disapprove of this sort of behavior aimed at heritage symbols (and people), we know they'll find it just hunky dory that Dejerrian Dequan was caught ... and are eagerly awaiting news that his accomplice has been found and arrested.
Confederate Flag Thief Nabbed By Florida Police -- Video of heist was filmed by cohort, uploaded to Facebook
AUGUST 24--The man who was filmed tearing down a Confederate flag
hanging outside a Florida residence has been arrested on theft charges,
according to police who have yet to collar the alleged thief’s
videographer/getaway driver.Dejerrian Dequan Murray, 24, was busted last week in connection with the July 11 flag theft at the Bradenton home of Robin Eaker, a 57-year-old Tropicana employee. Murray was charged with misdemeanor theft and freed on $2000 bond, according to court records. Entire report here.
Since some of the floggers have professed to disapprove of this sort of behavior aimed at heritage symbols (and people), we know they'll find it just hunky dory that Dejerrian Dequan was caught ... and are eagerly awaiting news that his accomplice has been found and arrested.
Sunday, August 23, 2015
If True, This Is Veddy Interesting...
And something De'Stroy, Simpson and the whole flogger clue would probably rather not acknowledge. These are government-lovers (at least, leftist government lovers) who really aren't excited about things that make the feds look bad.
Be that as it may, it appears the organizer of the recent KKK rally in Columbia, SC is an FBI asset... So sez a blog titled Stop Hate Crimes, which is not a reliable source. It is anonymous. The owner and publisher are not identified, and neither are contributors. No masthead, no statement of purpose, no location, no staff....
However, "not reliable" doesn't necessarily mean "all info at the site is false."
The Stop Hate Crimes article does reference a presumably reliable source, The Albany (NY) Times Union, which is a Hearst newspaper.
The Times Union reports that KKK leader Chris Barker wore a wire for the FBI in a somewhat bizarre New York weapons case.
The purported organizer of the Columbia KKK rally is identified as Chris Barker.
Hmmmm.... Would love to see more info on this from reliable sources....
Be that as it may, it appears the organizer of the recent KKK rally in Columbia, SC is an FBI asset... So sez a blog titled Stop Hate Crimes, which is not a reliable source. It is anonymous. The owner and publisher are not identified, and neither are contributors. No masthead, no statement of purpose, no location, no staff....
However, "not reliable" doesn't necessarily mean "all info at the site is false."
The Stop Hate Crimes article does reference a presumably reliable source, The Albany (NY) Times Union, which is a Hearst newspaper.
The Times Union reports that KKK leader Chris Barker wore a wire for the FBI in a somewhat bizarre New York weapons case.
The purported organizer of the Columbia KKK rally is identified as Chris Barker.
Hmmmm.... Would love to see more info on this from reliable sources....
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Destroy Blogger Belatedly Graduates
I've decided to quit using the term, Destroy Blogger... It's so unimaginative. So I'm turning it into a name. De'Stroy. Moreover, I am waaaaay tardy in elevating him to flogger status and his blog to a hate-flog status (if I haven't already done so. I have to admit I could have, and forgot about it. De'Stroy's blog isn't real ... memorable, ya know?)
Tear yourself away from the sewage in your computer, De'Stroy, and go out and celebrate, have a drink... a crap cocktail. It's on me.
So De'Stroy posts a screenshot of my entire blog post and sez,
Second, his blog is not chock full of facts, and I have in the past disputed and disproved what he's artfully calling "facts." Yes, some of it is true probably, but it's, you know, irrelevant to Southern heritage.
So he digs up some info on some obscure white supe who was gonna march to Washington carrying a Confederate flag, but quit well ahead of reaching the District of Corruption. And De'Stroy sez his writing about that "...makes her 'Heritage Movement' look like a total joke, and she's the punchline."
See, what De'Stroy doesn't understand -- or understands but ignores -- is that I not only do not know and have never heard of most of the sewage he swims in and the supes he obsesses about on his blog -- I don't care about it, either. Most of the people I know in the heritage community don't know them either. Yes, it is annoying that he uses that crap to attempt smearing good, decent heritage folks but, usually I just remind myself who is doing it and the audience it's intended for.
And, unlike De'Stroy and Simpson and the other floggers and their sick-o-fants, most ordinary folks have sense enough to do a logical assessment of groups of people -- that is, to see how they are both alike and different. And most people with said sense and objectivity know that said assessment will show the groups De'Stroy lusts to lump together don't actually belong together. The superficial linkin' and tyin' type of smear given wide usage by the Socialist Pecunious Lawyer Center has pretty much lost its potency.
The heritage movement only looks like a joke to people artificially portraying it that way. I suppose, if that's the only way to get your kicks ... but you look real pathetic to normal, healthy folks, ya know?
So then he sez Johnny Cooper is my favorite Flagger. I'm sure he knows this isn't true -- I admire Johnny, his march and the reasons he gave for doing it -- but my favorite Flagger, far and away, is Virginia Flagger Susan Hathaway, and coming in a close second behind her is Georgia Flagger Billy Bearden.
So De'Stroy is either lying or mistaken. In either case, do you reckon he will correct his flog?
He also sez "...Johnny is apparently being smeared by the Adolph Hitler loving, Ku Klux Klan supporting, 'Nigger' hating Southern Neo-Nazi Toby Hatfield," a white supe that reportedly marched with Johnny for a couple of days... De'Stroy admits he hasn't been able to verify this with Johnny Cooper...but he posts it as fact and wraps up with, "Now why on earth would Johnny Cooper want to march with this turd?"
(1) Do we know Johnny DID want to do this? (2) Did it actually happen? (3) If Hatfield did march with Johnny a couple of days, did Johnny even know who he was? (4) And having learned he was Toby Hatfield, did Johnny somehow automatically know Hatfield was a white supe?
See, there's a lot of infantile thinking amongst the Flogger community. Simpson believes if he hasn't read about it on the Internet, it hasn't happened. De'Stroy believes everyone in the Southern heritage community knows as much about white supes as he does. Evidently it never occurs to him that the manure he swims in, bathes in, soaks in day and night, like some kind of crap spa, is sewage to most people and something to be avoided.
Tear yourself away from the sewage in your computer, De'Stroy, and go out and celebrate, have a drink... a crap cocktail. It's on me.
So De'Stroy posts a screenshot of my entire blog post and sez,
"Connie Chastain is mad. She's real mad. She's mad because this blog is chock full of facts she can't dispute. The 'Pensacola Screecher', as she's known to many as, is really, really pissed off about our latest post, because it makes her "Heritage Movement" look like a total joke, and she's the punchline."Welp, foist off, I'm not mad. De'Stroy has never seen me mad. One has to wonder -- as is the case with Simpson and some others -- whether they know they are lying and do so anyway, from a fine disdain for both truth and ethical behavior, or whether they're so deluded by their willing slavery to their ideology that they don't know they're lying.... Y'all's guess about that is as good as mine.
Second, his blog is not chock full of facts, and I have in the past disputed and disproved what he's artfully calling "facts." Yes, some of it is true probably, but it's, you know, irrelevant to Southern heritage.
So he digs up some info on some obscure white supe who was gonna march to Washington carrying a Confederate flag, but quit well ahead of reaching the District of Corruption. And De'Stroy sez his writing about that "...makes her 'Heritage Movement' look like a total joke, and she's the punchline."
See, what De'Stroy doesn't understand -- or understands but ignores -- is that I not only do not know and have never heard of most of the sewage he swims in and the supes he obsesses about on his blog -- I don't care about it, either. Most of the people I know in the heritage community don't know them either. Yes, it is annoying that he uses that crap to attempt smearing good, decent heritage folks but, usually I just remind myself who is doing it and the audience it's intended for.
And, unlike De'Stroy and Simpson and the other floggers and their sick-o-fants, most ordinary folks have sense enough to do a logical assessment of groups of people -- that is, to see how they are both alike and different. And most people with said sense and objectivity know that said assessment will show the groups De'Stroy lusts to lump together don't actually belong together. The superficial linkin' and tyin' type of smear given wide usage by the Socialist Pecunious Lawyer Center has pretty much lost its potency.
The heritage movement only looks like a joke to people artificially portraying it that way. I suppose, if that's the only way to get your kicks ... but you look real pathetic to normal, healthy folks, ya know?
So then he sez Johnny Cooper is my favorite Flagger. I'm sure he knows this isn't true -- I admire Johnny, his march and the reasons he gave for doing it -- but my favorite Flagger, far and away, is Virginia Flagger Susan Hathaway, and coming in a close second behind her is Georgia Flagger Billy Bearden.
So De'Stroy is either lying or mistaken. In either case, do you reckon he will correct his flog?
He also sez "...Johnny is apparently being smeared by the Adolph Hitler loving, Ku Klux Klan supporting, 'Nigger' hating Southern Neo-Nazi Toby Hatfield," a white supe that reportedly marched with Johnny for a couple of days... De'Stroy admits he hasn't been able to verify this with Johnny Cooper...but he posts it as fact and wraps up with, "Now why on earth would Johnny Cooper want to march with this turd?"
(1) Do we know Johnny DID want to do this? (2) Did it actually happen? (3) If Hatfield did march with Johnny a couple of days, did Johnny even know who he was? (4) And having learned he was Toby Hatfield, did Johnny somehow automatically know Hatfield was a white supe?
See, there's a lot of infantile thinking amongst the Flogger community. Simpson believes if he hasn't read about it on the Internet, it hasn't happened. De'Stroy believes everyone in the Southern heritage community knows as much about white supes as he does. Evidently it never occurs to him that the manure he swims in, bathes in, soaks in day and night, like some kind of crap spa, is sewage to most people and something to be avoided.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)