Friday, April 20, 2012

Unless You Say Yer Agin' It, You Must Be Fer It?

There's a fellow named Marc Ferguson who post frequently on civil-war-era-memory-type bash-Dixie blogs -- another critic who (1) wears race-colored glasses, so that it tinges eveything he sees, and (2) focuses on a small, worst segment and pretends it is the whole.

He recently posted this to me on Cousin Perfesser Brooks Simpson's Crossroads blawg. (I'm editing it slightly but only to add paragraph breaks, and remove non-pertinent "introductory" sentences, not to otherwise alter wording or meaning.)
I have read your exchanges with Hunter Wallace on his racist blog “Occidntal Dissent” and your replies to other commenters here on “Crossroads” however, and it is noteworthy that you have never taken an opportunity to disavow white supremacy.
I can easily imagine that Mr. Wallace would include you, as he has me, among those who are N****r Lover, and that I probably live in some “Whitetopia,” and should take my kids to live in a minority neighborhood, where I would learn that non-whites are evolutionarily inferior to whites, and have never created, nor been able to sustain a real “civilization.”
For anyone wondering what this “civilization” might be, I would refer you (yes, you, Connie, and anyone else who is not certain what this might mean) to the episodes of the documentary “Eyes on the Prize,” especially the ones featuring the murders of Emmitt Till and Medgar Evers, and Bull Connor turning the fire hoses on activists protesting white businesses that refused to hire blacks. Examples of “civilization” in the segregated American South.
For the record, Hunter Wallace accuses me of being a N****r Lover because I believe that African Americans are human beings, and should be accorded full civil rights, and treated with human dignity. Do you?
I await your disavowal of this, Mr. Wallace’s, style of racism.
Waal, Mr. Ferguson, I have read your comments on Crossroads and elsewhere, and I find it is noteworthy that you have never taken an opportunity to disavow pedaphilia. I find it noteworthy that you have never taken the opportunity to disavow torture by the CIA and the U.S. military. I find it noteworthy that you have never taken the opportunity to disavow the U.S. government killing its own citizens (Waco, Ruby Ridge, Kent State). I find it noteworthy that you have never taken the opportunity to disavow Mike Nifong's attempted railroading of three innocent young men for rape.

You see, Ferguson, it isn't necessary to disavow support for everything one doesn't support. As long as one has not openly supported or advocated it, it can safely be assumed that one doesn't support it. Capisce?

 This is particularly true of those who support Southern heritage, when so many people, such as yourself, attempt to conflate such support with racial hatred.... It is not incumbent upon Southern heritage advocate to "disavow white supremacy" as their lack of support for it should be sufficient. What's incumbent, Ferguson, is for you to not automatically conflate support of Southern heritage with support for white supremacy.

Your citing "examples of civilization in the segregated American South" (and the ones you cite) is itself an example ... an example of focusing on a small, worst segment and attempting to pass it off as the whole. Overall, segregation in the South was a not a positive experience; however, to totally define it as murder is a lie that, in my opinion, is motivated at least in part by hatred of white Southerners.

I don't believe in macro-evolution; I believe all human beings were made by God in His image (which, to my understanding, means possessing a soul that can exist in the dimension of timelessness we call eternity). As we used to sing in Sunday school, that means "red and yellow, black and white."

Satisfied, Mr. Ferguson? Good. Now you can run along to your NAMBLA meeting without worrying about my views on race....

5 comments:

  1. Ferguson is just another of the many sanctimonious, self-righteous yankee blowhards that inhabit Civil War sites and blogs.

    A most fitting description of this group-

    "A meddling Yankee troubles himself about everybody’s matters except his own and repents of everybody’s sins [-and imagined sins-] except his own." -Daniel Harvey Hill

    ReplyDelete
  2. You see, Ferguson, it isn't necessary to disavow support for everything one doesn't support. As long as one has not openly supported or advocated it, it can safely be assumed that one doesn't support it. Capisce?

    Not true at all. An adulterer is usually quiet about his affairs. Not to say that you are an adulterer or anything but the statement stands alone. It is usually through our disavowing of things that people understand we are against it, not the other way around. Until then, we don't assume. You know what happens when you "assume" Connie? Capisce?

    I do wish you would read my post on your definition of multiculturalism and your definition of "heritage." You fit the criteria that you assume he sets up for you. Ultimately this is another straw man point, building a case so that you can then take it down.

    "Red and yellow, black and white" refers to all the children of the world that Jesus loves. Not the Children that God made in his image. To clarify, the song isn't about God, making in his image people of different colors. That would mean, by your definition, that God is rainbow colored since they are all in his image. Unless of course you think evolution does exist and the skin colors changed over time.

    You also never answered his question Connie. He stated,

    ...because I believe that African Americans are human beings, and should be accorded full civil rights, and treated with human dignity. Do you? I await your disavowal of this, Mr. Wallace’s, style of racism.

    He wasn't talking about races being made in God's image he was asking whether or not you agreed with him, in opposition to Wallace, that all races deserve Civil Rights. Which you did not answer. Instead you chose to give a definition of God's races of equality based on souls. You did not address the aspect of Civil Rights, identified as Hunter Wallace's style of racism. This yet again shows the large downfall of your logic. You create a straw man to attack him without addressing any issues he brought forward. I will also ask that you answer his question.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rob, I don't have to justify myself to Marc Ferguson or anyone else. The whole tone of his post is accusatory. If somebody wants me to answer a question, that's not the way to ask it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have a deal with God, That's all anyone needs to know.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Comment from Rob says, "Still waiting on my last comment to be approved...."

    Man, do I know how you feel, Rob, from my experiences at Crossroads. Looks like both of us are gonna have to wait until hell freezes over....

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome, but monitored.