So, other than Grant which should be a gimme, can you name anyone else in the room?
I dare you to try? Remember you have claimed to be as much of a historian as you. I'm sure I am wasting my time since all you will do is take the answers from Brooks' blog.
No, I can't name them. So, if I could, that would make me a historian to you? All it takes to be a historian is to name the individual dirty yankees in that picture? LOL.
No, I'm not going to waste my time identifying them individually, either.
So, other than Grant which should be a gimme, can you name anyone else in the room?
ReplyDeleteI dare you to try? Remember you have claimed to be as much of a historian as you. I'm sure I am wasting my time since all you will do is take the answers from Brooks' blog.
No, I can't name them. So, if I could, that would make me a historian to you? All it takes to be a historian is to name the individual dirty yankees in that picture? LOL.
ReplyDeleteNo, I'm not going to waste my time identifying them individually, either.
No, Id'ing them would not make you a historian, but you claim to be one like me or better so naming them would not be a problem.
ReplyDeleteSorry, you don't get to define what all historians know.
ReplyDeleteAnd no, Corey, I have never claimed to be a historian like you. Only that I meet the definition as much as you do.
How in the word do you meet the definition as much as he does, pray tell?
ReplyDeleteRob. http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2011/08/coreys-back-for-more.html
ReplyDeleteOh, gee, thanks. I keep forgetting your blog is an authority on what constitutes a historian.
ReplyDelete