Any guesses? Has H.K. ever done anything to Levin?
It appears to be the same type of obsession as Simpson's with Susan Hathaway.
As far as I know, neither Susan nor H.K. have ever done anything to either of these men. So why the hate -- hate so strong they have to periodically showcase it on their blogs?
They hate'em, not so much as for who they are, but for what they stand for. The flag issues, any Confederate symbolism, Southern culture and heritage is what these demons can't stand. That is because they are opposed to what's inside that person, their faith and beliefs. They only way to combat this is by attacking that faith with all its' symbols, INCLUDING the person. If all else fails, then that person must be destroyed in order that the opposition's faith prevail.
ReplyDeleteWe are ONLY seeing the result of a battle that goes MUCH deeper than anything related to Lincoln's War or the South itself. We are seeing a battle for the mind and soul of all people, with the opposition actually trying to dictate the terms of how every last person should think and act. And they, our opponents calls this freedom. That they are espousing freedom and equality. It's as clear as crystal who the real racists and demons really are. Else Christ will be regulated to hell, along with all of His people of course.
The dumbed down stupid yankees reacts and thinks, what's that crazy Michael talking about now? But I bet every real Southerner here can identify with every last thing I said! It's simply because not all the people can understand Scripture. I don't mean in direct relation to the South and Lincoln's War, but rather where we get our basis for our understanding and faith. Fore it is written that His word is NOT for everyone to understand, and the yankees can't understand any of it. That's because they are demons wrapped in human skin. (Anyone of my own here doubting this needs to read more from Clyde Wilson. Though I knew this way before I read or heard of him. BTW, I recently found out that Clyde Wilson and myself grew up in close proximity to each other, though several years separating us.)
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
Brother H.K. is a target of Levin's hate because the weasel and his blogger pals know that they can get by with implying any sort of hateful stereotype and calling him any sort of name without any sort of ramifications at all. Typical bully mentality.
ReplyDeleteThe way I see it, they see H.K. as a betrayer of leftist race orthodoxy. He does not toe the party line, and in fact refutes it. He is not useful for portraying blacks as helpless and oppressed, nor for demonizing white folks -- the two most valuable functions of black folks in the leftist mentality. That makes him an enemy, punishable by ridicule, lies, etc.
ReplyDeleteYes Ms Connie you are right in that respect. I cannot disagree at all. Still the bottom line for anyone being attacked by these yankee scum is the fact of what they believe and represent. In the case of HK his color would undoubtedly single him out for special criticism and attack. It's simply another means for their accomplishing their ends. And it is quiet effective. Of course their ends means the end of all people like us, regardless of color. To them HK becomes a Black White racist whose faith and beliefs MUST be stopped and destroyed, for it is a great thorn in their side.
ReplyDeleteMichael-- Deo Vindicabamur
In my opinion, Levin and all the others like him hate H. K. Edgerton because Edgerton's very existence proves the whole lot of Yankee authors/propagandist to be liars. How often do we hear of white racist in the South, southerners mistreating black people, southerners violating black people's civil rights, that slave owners were mean and cruel to their slaves, that the North was forced to wage a holy war against the South to free the slaves, and on and on ad nauseam.
ReplyDeleteH. K. Edgerton knows the whole lot are liars, and that fact scares the devil right out of Levin, Simpson, Mackey, Hall, and a host of other Yankee liars. The Yankee liars are much like the race baiters who promote division between the races as a money making venture. How long before we are blessed with another one of their "books" promoting lies and hatred for southern heritage?
H.K. Does a wonderful job of portraying blacks as blissfully ignorant Connie.
ReplyDeleteRob,
ReplyDelete(1) That's why Levin hates him?
(2) What do you know about H.K.?
Ms Janice,
ReplyDelete"..How long before we are blessed with another one of their "books" promoting lies and hatred for southern heritage? .."
How long before we are blessed for being God fearing people, honoring Him, and He free us from our bondage is the real question. I know we have have not been forsaken because I know we are right in what we believe.
It was even wrote on the last of our Confederate flags as a tribute and continued faith in our God. It was written, "Deo Vindice", in that God will Vindicate us. We may have lost that war but it was for God's reasons, not ours; fore we did so try and held our faith.
I'll say it was because God still had work for us, and the end time was not here yet, in which the devil needed time to finish fulfilling his dirty deeds. And all this happened to us, not for us being wrong, but in order to use us in proving to the world our and His justifications. God allowed the same thing to happen to Job. (For you yankees, Job doesn't mean work.)
Just know everything happens for a reason. Even as badly as we are out-numbered, it is for a reason, making the victory sweeter.
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
Ignorant intolerant flogger states: "H.K. Does a wonderful job of portraying blacks as blissfully ignorant Connie."
ReplyDeleteUh, there has to be a huge gaping disconnect here. How does the actions of a single individual in any way, shape, or form dictate the behavior, or perceived behavior, of a whole ethnic group?
I am not a Leftist so I don't automatically group all individuals into one group-think identity viewpoint and have no way to relate to the idea that one person is solely responsible for the overall preconceptions of a whole class of people.
Please explain Rob how one man - a man I am guessing you have never personally tried to meet or contact and do not know - can accomplish such a thing.
Mike, I agree with you almost one hundred percent. The South has "not been forsaken because I know we are right in what we believe."
ReplyDeleteThe only thing I disagree with you is when you said, "[W]e may have lost that war." Well, I'm not too sure we lost that war. I think it's too early to tell.
Actually the whole nation lost, because of Lincoln's War of Northern Aggression.
To understand who lost, all one has to do is look at Detroit, Michigan, and its $18,000,000,000,000 bankruptcy, and all the other government entities in the same boat. All the events and circumstances, too numerous to count here, that caused Detroit's bankruptcy are directly related to Abraham Lincoln and his unholy war.
We are not learning from our past, largely because of ignorant and racist Yankees hell bent on distorting true history, and we are repeating our mistakes daily.
So at present I say the whole country lost, and we are still losing ground everyday. It will take a miracle to turn this thing around now. We have to believe that miracle is forthcoming soon.
1. I can't speak for Kevin, I think this is a conversation we've had before but insert Brooks Simpson instead.
ReplyDelete2.
a. He flagged my hometown, I talked to him then.
b. I ran into him again at the Ft. Sanders re-enactment in 2008 (or 9, I can't remember the specifics but it is one of those years) and we talked again. I regret not getting a picture but he did give me a free t-shirt.
c. A lot about him easily available online given his speeches, website and his history with the NAACP.
Carl Roden (aka Amanda) has an apparent reading comprehension issue. I specifically said, which he quoted by the way,
ReplyDelete"H.K. Does a wonderful job of portraying blacks as blissfully ignorant Connie."
Only a fool would suggest that I referred to an "entire ethnic group" rather than just H.K., since I made him the subject of that sentence. No where in that sentence did I suggest that he is a representative of a group. How about you stop grabbing at straws?
So, Rob, the post was about why Levin has it in for H.K. You said H;K. portrays blacks as blissfully ignorant, and I asked if that's why Levin hates him.
ReplyDeleteYou can''t speak for Levin, but you can't speak for ANYone, but yourself, and you speak ABOUT people all the flippin' time. So, is that why Levin hates H.K, do you think?
Telling me you talked to H.K. doesn't tell me what you KNOW about him. Telling me he has info online doesn't tell me what you know about him.
So you think H.K. is portraying blacks?
Uh oh, words with all caps, gloves must be coming off.
ReplyDelete1. I don't think Levin hates H.K. And I think your post is centered around a loaded question.
2. That depends on what you imply by the word, "know".
3. I know what I'm implying by using the word "portray", what are you implying by using that word?
Levin certainly exhibits animosity for H.K. If he just disagreed with H.K.'s interpretation of history, why all the ridicule and hatred in posts like this?
ReplyDeletehttp://cwmemory.com/2013/12/04/more-entertainment-for-white-people/
http://cwmemory.com/2013/12/03/when-in-doubt-bring-in-h-k-edgerton/
And in hosting and accommodating comment threads that are more of the same?
This is why I think it is a huge lie that you flogger types just disagree with the "heritage, not history" folks. Floggers exhibit visible, nay conspicuous, hatred for heritage folks that amounts to a huge overkill for just getting history wrong.
So now its animosity and hatred?
ReplyDeleteProbably because the title of the website is Civil War Memory. His academic career, publication history and blog provides a preponderance of evidence that proves his interest in history and specifically, how humans today remember historical events. That pretty much makes H.K. Edgerton, right up the proverbial alley. It also makes any aspects of heritage, right or wrong, right up that alley.
Getting "history wrong," is not a problem. It happens a lot. Check my recent blog posts where I correspond with the Jefferson Foundation and the Weider History Group. The issue is the claims of righteousness;the historical arguments which are downright wrong, reinforced by calling those that disagree liberal, politically correct, fascist, etc. etc...
RoboCop,
ReplyDeleteIn regards to Kevin Levin
"...a preponderance of evidence..."
You're a laughing joke....
The creep is a nut job....
Just to let you know a preponderance of evidence is NOT facts or truth, although some can be intertwined.
Levin, gives only HIS opinions, just as the rest of your kind does. (We've already covered *OPINIONS* in past comments on this blog.)
A more important issue to remember about Kevin Levin, is he will ALWAYS be vehemently anti-Southern. He has this as a natural tendency because of his own culture and faith. You see Kevin Levin is a Khazar and ABSOLUTELY no Khazar embraces anything Southern. They actually don't embrace anything Christian and little of Western Civilization. The end result being this also distinguishes the differences between Yankees and Southerners. It is also the reason that Ms Connie had been so harshly treated by him at his blog.
Poor ole Levin, he wouldn't last 5 minutes against me. He wouldn't even make a good tour guide...
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
ReplyDeleteYes, it is animosity and hatred, Rob. I haven't the slightest interest in "checking your blog" for "Jefferson Foundation and the Weider History Group" yodeling.
So the issue is claims of righteousness when somebody besides the floggers do it, but it's okay for them, huh? So you don't like "liberal, politically correct, fascist," but you don't mind "idiot, troglodyte, clown, galactically stupid, knuckle-draggers, morons, cretins"?
Levin has it in for Confederate heritage, and he homes in on H.K. because he is affronted by a black man who doesn't participate in the evilization of Southern white folks, past and present.
Notice how Andy makes a point of bringing up H.K.'s alleged mishandling of local NAACP chapter funds, but seems oblivious to Benjamin F. Chavis Jr., and William F. Gibson sending the national organization into staggering debt (almost 50 million dollars), and spending organization funds on personal expenses.... I guess it's only bad if a black man who doesn't evilize Southern whites does it....
Yes, it is animosity and hatred, Rob. I haven't the slightest interest in "checking your blog" for "Jefferson Foundation and the Weider History Group" yodeling.
ReplyDeleteSure it is Connie. Thanks for not checking my blog Connie, it really demonstrates your closed-mindedness after seeing your argument obliterated.
So the issue is claims of righteousness when somebody besides the floggers do it, but it's okay for them, huh? So you don't like "liberal, politically correct, fascist," but you don't mind "idiot, troglodyte, clown, galactically stupid, knuckle-draggers, morons, cretins"?
I never said or implied that. How about you stop grabbing at straws?
Levin has it in for Confederate heritage, and he homes in on H.K. because he is affronted by a black man who doesn't participate in the evilization of Southern white folks, past and present.
That's your opinion, which is wrong. Kevin has a long track history that demonstrates his motives for commenting on H.K. It is because of Levin's study of historical memory involving the Civil War. Do you really insist that there must be conflict in every disagreement? Why is that?
Notice how Andy makes a point of bringing up H.K.'s alleged mishandling of local NAACP chapter funds, but seems oblivious to Benjamin F. Chavis Jr., and William F. Gibson sending the national organization into staggering debt (almost 50 million dollars), and spending organization funds on personal expenses.... I guess it's only bad if a black man who doesn't evilize Southern whites does it....
Andy has done more than anyone I know of to research Edgerton's track history. The reason he looks at Edgerton's history of mishandling funds draws into question his criticisms of the NAACP. But I would also like to point out that, that is not the only thing Andy highlighted. Tu Quoque Connie, it's so easy to call you on it because you commit it so often as a means of deflection. It doesn't matter what those men did, what matters is the subject material, H.K. Edgerton.