Friday, September 6, 2013

Oh, Those Self-Righteous Floggers....

In a comment thread about Matt Heimbach at Dead Confederates, Neil Hamilton remarks: "It seems like the excuse is 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend.' If any organization reaches this point, where it will accept support from the likes of Matt Heimbach, they have not only lost their way, their point, and their one-time goals, but their very souls."

Their very souls? How very melodramatic. Or, as my Pop used to say in imitation of his mountaineer grandpaw, "That's high meller-drammer." Aside from the fact that there's no evidence that the Flaggers "accepted support" from Heimbach (he attended some events where they were present, and made four posts on an open Facebook group) there is also no evidence that they knew what his racial beliefs and activities were when he attended those events. In the time since his activities have become more widely known, he has not attended Flagger events; and it is doubtful that most Flaggers would recognize him if they passed him on the street.

Don't worry, Neil. The VaFlaggers haven't lost their way, their point, their goals or their souls.Unfortunately for all the flogger bellyachers out there, the I-95 flag IS GOING UP and Richmond ain't gonna crumble, sink, or go broke because of it.

Andy Hall (who, apparently, still hasn't acknowledged that the lawsuit against Paula Deen alleging racial discrimination was tossed out) notes: "...there seems to be a high tolerance for old-fashioned bigotry and casual racial nastiness among some subsets of Confederate heritage types. References to the NAACP as the “tan klan” are common and unremarked-upon." 

That phrase, tan klan, was coined by African-American Walter Williams, an economist at George Mason University, and is used by conservatives in general, not just heritage folks, to describe some of the authoritarian antics of the NAACP.

Andy writes, "Not long ago a member on SHPG showed up and commented on “coon” King and talked about how he celebrated when MLK “got popped.” He was admonished for posting that comment there, but not asked to leave, or removed."

In fact, the person's membership was removed pretty much within hours if not minutes of his last comment on the SHPG thread in question, which I demonstrated almost a month ago, here: http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/08/interesting-things-goin-on.html

But has Andy corrected that? Nope.

He continues, "They don’t seem to care much if their members hold those views, so long as they express them elsewhere, in a way that doesn’t reflect immediately back on the group."

Actually, unlike floggers, leftists, authoritarian PC-ers and the like, Southern heritage folks are mostly conservatives, and  conservatives usually believe nobody has the authority to tell others what to believe, even if the others believe in offensive things. They value freedom of speech and thought. Floggers and other authoritarians do not believe in freedom of speech and thought. They get off on telling people what they can and cannot say and even think....
















Andy sez, "What matters is their fealty to heritage; we’ve already seen two very prominent Flaggers, Billy Bearden and Tripp Lewis, come to the defense of Heimbach’s commitment to honoring his Confederate ancestors."

And the problem with that is....???? Neither Billy nor Tripp came to the defense of Heimbach's racial beliefs, correct?

Andy concludes, "But more broadly, yeah — they’re much more angry about people exposing the stupid/ridiculous/offensive stuff that goes on in their ranks, than they are with the people doing the stupid/ridiculous/offensive stuff in the first place.

Actually, Andy, what they're angry about is hypocritical, self-righteous floggers who lie, spin and distort in the guise of "exposing" stupid/ridiculous/offensive among those they dislike, but ignoring hateful/mendacious/sickening stuff from their own ranks....

Thursday, September 5, 2013

And Now for Something Completely Different

Instilling White Guilt In Innocent Children
__________________________________________________

 Sweet Southern Boys

Legacy of Fortitude -- Book Two

by Connie Chastain

Excerpt


Chapter Thirteen

"Ainsley, are you coming?" Erin McGhee planted her fists on her hips and gave Ainsley an exasperated stare. 

"I'm finished." Seated at a wooden table under a primitive pavilion on the quadrangle of Silver Pines Day Camp, Ainsley snapped the lid on a plastic tub that held her craft projects. In no hurry, she slid the tub under the table.

"You don't want to go on the canoe picnic, do you?"

Ainsley shrugged.  "Not really."

"Me, neither.  Nobody does, but we can't back out now."

"I wish we could.  I would."

"Me, too.  I'm glad this is the last day of camp. This has been the worse camp ever. I'm not coming back next year."

"I won't, either.  At least, not if--"

Erin looked at her knowingly  "Not if Counselor Nora comes back."

Ainsley nodded solemnly. 

The two girls rambled across the grassy quadrangle, past the rustic administration buildings, headed for Juniper Creek, which meandered through the campground and the fields and woodlands that surrounded it.  Stifling August heat suffused the air and the girls broke out in a sheen of sweat. 

This was Ainsley's fourth year as a Silver Pines camper.  Her first session had occurred a year to the month after the dog mauling that had left her traumatized for so long  and she hadn't really wanted to go.  But her mama had said, "Just go the first day, and if you don't like it, you don't have to go back."

She had loved it from that first day, and looked forward to it every summer.  She didn't care for sports and opted out of most, though she enjoyed hiking the nature trails.  She much preferred the petting zoo, skits and most of all, crafts. 

This year, she had made a mirror with a seashell frame for her mother, a ceramic paperweight for her father's desk at work, and for Shelby a computer diskette storage box decoupaged with bits of construction paper.  They sat in her storage tub under the craft table, awaiting the trip home. While she was proud of her creations, she had not enjoyed camp this year. Erin was right; camp had been terrible this summer and the reason was the presence of a new counselor, Nora Weir.

Few if any campers actually liked Counselor Nora, as she preferred to be called.

"Do NOT call me Miss Nora," she'd told the campers on the first day. "Or Miss Weir or Miss Anything. That is a pretentious, saccharine Southernism I will not have applied to me."

She was forever criticizing Southerners as backward hayseeds, though she was careful not to apply those terms to the campers, their families, or anyone they knew.  She complained of the heat, the bugs, the critters, and said she'd never had to worry about such things growing up in New England.  Almost nothing of Southern culture and tradition, from its prominent religiosity, to family, to food and music, escaped her criticism, although she was very subtle about it.

"She hates our lizards," Ainsley had told Shelby shortly after camp began.  "Even the little green ones with the red throats. She says she'd have all the bushes around her apartment cut down if her landlord would let her, cause they're full of 'em'

"Well, that's silly," Shelby replied.  "Carolina anoles are some of the purtiest little lizards on the planet."

If the counselor's constant fault-finding wasn't offputting enough, there was the way she looked and acted.  Tall and gaunt, with light skin and pale gray eyes, she had wispy, ash-blond hair that she pulled into a pony tail most of the time.  One day in the latrine, Ainsley had overheard one of the older campers describe her as cadaverous.  Her thin, grating voice, owl-like stare, her stalking gait and general creepiness had caused the campers to nickname her Counselor Weird.

"The canoe picnic wouldn't be so bad," Erin said, "if Miss Jackie or Miss Barbara was in charge.  But it's Counselor Nora's project and Lindsey Duncan says she picked all seven of special."

For some reason, that information ratcheted up Ainsley's discomfort and her steps slowed.  "I wonder why us..."

"Who cares," Erin said, suddenly impatient.  "Look, let's just go and get it over with. It's not that far to the picnic place in the woods.  We'll go, eat, come back and then it will be over."

***
The four canoes glided single file  through the still water. The lead canoe, occupied by Counselor Nora and her buddy for the trip, Joanie Wilson, whom nobody envied, carried a backpack and hard-sided cooler full of picnic items.

On the aft seat of the last canoe, Ainsley glanced over her shoulder as the buildings of Silver Pines disappeared and the forest of ubiquitous slash pines closed in around the creek. Sudden and strong foreboding took Ainsley in its grip and she struggled to suppress it with rationality.  Everything would be all right.  It was just a canoe trip and picnic.  She had done this at least once every year she'd been a camper.

But the notion that everything would be all right gave way to a greater feeling of abnormality when Counselor Nora called, "Everybody stop rowing." 

The canoes came to a slow halt and the campers looked at each other curiously.  Ainsley heard Erin's low mutter, "We're paddling, not rowing, you stupid woman."

Counselor Nora maneuvered the lead canoe around and paddled back toward the other boats.  She stopped at the first one.  "I'm going to tether the canoes together in a line, so nobody gets lost."

"No counselor's ever done that," said one of the girls, but Counselor Nora ignored her.  As the campers watched with curiosity and a hint of suspicion, she threaded a rope through metal rings at the bow and stern of the canoes and tied them with complicated knots that looked impossible to untie.

"There will be about ten feet of rope separating each canoe, so you don't have to worry about collisions."  A corner of her mouth quirked up as if she'd said something cute, but nobody laughed.  Her characteristic lack of humor returned immediately and she added, "Everybody still has to paddle.  You can't just sit back and let the boats in front pull you along."

With that, she and Joanie paddled back to the lead and the now solemn flotilla got underway again.

The second upset occurred when they approached the Picnic Place in the Woods, as it was known -- which comprised a grassy clearing next to the creek and four wooden picnic tables  under shelters like the pavilions on the quadrangle. 

Counselor Nora called out to them, "We're not going to have the picnic here. We're going to a special place, so everyone keep rowing."

For a few moments, silence met her announcement, but soon, the plaintiff voice of the youngest camper on the trip, first grader Cindy Jeffcoat, said, "I want to go back to camp now."

The lead canoe rocked slightly as Counselor Nora twisted to look behind her, her face like thunder. "We'll go back after the picnic."

Again, the campers looked at each other in perplexity and their touch of suspicion rose a several notches.

They paddled and paddled.  The creek narrowed and widened, curved and straightened.  The woods on each side changed character several times, from slash pines shading sawgrass, to palmetto forests beneath live oak canopies.  Underbrush of wax myrtles and yaupon holly thickened as the campers paddled deeper into the woods.

The heat was stifling, and not the barest breeze touched the campers.  Once, somebody said, "I'm thirsty.  I want some water," but Counselor Nora  knocked on the lid of a rigid cooler strapped into the lead canoe and said, "There will be plenty of cold water at the picnic."

None of the girls had worn a watch and they lost track of time but it seemed like they'd been gone a long time, and still, Nora pressed them on.  Eventually, though, they stopped, simply because they could go no further.  A concrete barrier across the creek blocked their progress.  A bridge, it looked like.  It was too low to paddle under, the bottom edge barely a foot above the water's surface.  The canoes drifted as the counselor seemed to consider her options.

"Okay, right back there is where we'll have the picnic," she said.  "The clearing beyond that grassy patch of bank we passed a few minutes ago."

Somebody muttered, "I thought we was going to some special place..." but the counselor ignored her. It didn't take long before they reached the grassy bank, and pulled the canoes ashore.

"Everybody find a place to sit," Counselor Nora ordered.

The grass ended a few feet from the creek and the clearing was hot and dusty.  A fallen tree provided seating for most, but Ainsley didn't join them.  Beside her, Lindsey Duncan, the oldest at fourteen, muttered, "Looks snaky to me," and Ainsley whispered, "Me, too."

"Let's sit here," Lindsey said, sotto voce, and they sat on the seats of the nearest canoe as Counselor Nora lugged the cooler, backpack and a camp stool, to the middle of the clearing. She saw them as she set the cooler down and ordered sharply, "Get out of the boat."

"There's no other place to sit," Lindsey said defiantly.  She  and Ainsley remained where they were as the counselor passed out bottles of water. There evidently wasn't much ice in the cooler, because the water was not cold.  It was cool, however, and wet, and the thirsty campers guzzled it down. 

"Before I hand out the food, I want to tell you all something." She opened the stool and sat down to face them.  "I brought you out here for a lesson.  A history lesson about the place and the people where you live."

The campers exchanged perplexed looks.

"You probably don't know it," the counselor droned in her grating voice, "because this  place strives assiduously, and successfully, to distance itself from its evil past, but before the Civil War, Yancy County was plantation country.  Cotton plantations. Where the masters owned slaves who worked the fields.  You think it's hot here, today, in the woods?  You should try being a slave and picking cotton by hand, in the merciless sun, no shade, no rest, no water...  And if you don't do it fast enough to suit the master...  you get whipped to within an inch of your life."

The campers had gone stock still, their eyes wide. Little Cindy quavered, "I wanna go back now."

"Me too," somebody whispered, Ainsley wasn't sure who, and someone else muttered,  "What kinda picnic is this?"

"I told you," Counselor Nora said, her pale eyes gleaming with malice. "A history picnic. You're going to learn about slavery, because your vaunted Southern white privilege system won't teach you about it." She paused to reach into the cooler and pulled out small take-out boxes of white cardboard and handed them out.  "Don't open them until everybody has one."

When they were all distributed, she said, "Okay, open your food."

Ainsley opened her box.  Inside was a small square of moldy, crumbling cornbread and a half-pint carton of buttermilk. She didn't say anything but the "Gross!" and "Oh, yuck!" and similar outbursts from the other campers echoed her feelings.

"This is slave food, and you have to eat it so you'll get just a tiny taste of the miserable lives they lived. Oh, you don't have to eat it all.  Just one bite and one sip."

The campers stared at her, dumbstruck. "Where's our sandwiches and chips and cokes?" Erin demanded.

 "You don't get it, do you, McGhee?  That is your picnic lunch and we're not going back until every last one of you takes at least one bite and one sip. You don't have to eat it right now, because I still have lots of history to tell you. But you will eat it before we leave."

A few of the campers took tentative nibbles of the cornbread.  Others sipped the lukewarm buttermilk. Gagging and gurgling punctuated the heat-filled air.  Little Cindy threw up.

Incredibly, Counselor Nora gazed at Cindy with a touch of satisfaction in her cadaverous eyes, and swept them across her charges with annoyance while she waited for them to quiet down.

Then, in great detail, she told them lurid tales of whippings and rapes during slavery times in Yancey County, and of lynchings and murders after emancipation.  She spent most of the time relating the details of a particularly horrible lynching spree in the 1920s -- a dreadful episode that included the hanging a pregnant woman and the grisly murder of her unborn child.

"All because evil white Southerners were so full of hatred," Nora finished.  "And you still are.  Every one of you girls had ancestors in Verona  back then.  You are as responsible for the lynchings and murder as they were, because their blood is in you, there hatred is in you.  It's time you all learned about the evil history your culture keeps from you.  It's time for you to get in touch with your inner race-hater."

She stood and strolled to a nearby slash pine more than a foot in diameter and slapped the bark.

"Imagine that this tree is your plantation whipping post.  And imagine that one of your trouble-making slaves, stripped to the waist, is tied to it."

She stepped to the backpack, reached inside and brought out at coil of leather.  The campers stared at it, aghast.

"Who wants to volunteer to whip the slave?  I know you're scared at the idea right now -- or you're pretending to be.  But once you start, you'll really get into it. Antebellum Southerners enjoyed beating their slaves the way northerners enjoyed a Shakespeare play at the theater.  So it'll come to you. Who wants to go first?"

Horror descended on Nora's captive audience as she paced in front of them, and they began to sob softly.

An ominous feeling such as she'd never known overcame Ainsley and filled her with paralyzing dread.  This was not the terror of attack by an animal ruled by instinct, but the terror of sheer human malevolence.  She tried to block out the macabre images Counselor Nora's words put in her mind, but they were impossible to escape. Nausea from the cornbread and buttermilk she had choked down compounded her distress.

Nora stopped her talking and pacing in front of the canoe where Ainsley and Lindsey sat.

"Kincaid, here.  You lead off."

Ainsley recoiled and let out a soft, anguished wail.

"Weak as well as wicked," Nora grated.  "Get up!"

She grabbed Ainsley's upper arm, pulled her to her feet and shoved her toward the tree.  She thrust the whip toward her.

"Show us how your ancestors did it.  Show us how they whipped slave mothers and lynched the babies of freedmen...for no reason except hatred of their black skin.  Take the whip, Kincaid.  You know it's in you to do it.  Now show us."

Staring at the whip, Ainsley took a step back, wiping her hands on her shorts.  She raised her panicked eyes to the malevolent entity Nora had become and swept them across the other campers, who stared back at her in terror.

"No!"  Ainsley screamed.  She took off into the woods, blinded by tears, running as fast as her legs would carry her.

She was vaguely aware of Counselor Nora and the other campers calling her name, begging her to come back, but their voices grew fainter as she ran deeper into the dusty woods, and finally faded away into the stifling air.

_________________________________

Somewhere In Virginia


Nope. He's Still Not A Flagger

From the Richmond Times-Dispatch:
The Flaggers have a core group of about 50 active members in the Richmond area, but more than 500 people have attended events put on by the group, Jones said.
At most, Matt Heimbach is one of the 500 who attended events put on by the Flaggers. He is not part of the core group of active members, as they are identified as being in the Richmond area and Heimbach is from Maryland.

Dave Tatum wrapped the whole issue up well in a Facebook post: 
    I've seen a number of pictures of Matthew,and to tell ya the truth, if he were to walk up to me on the street I wouldn't know who he was.
    The floggers are gonna grasp an any negative item they can and fabricate a connection if one doesn't exist.
    To tell ya the truth, I'm getting bored with all the Hoo Ha.
    Yep some wack job has aligned himself with the Flaggers and taken advantage of a few photo ops.
    I'm sure that every organization has a racist or two in it, that doesn't make the organization racist.
 Right on, Bro. Dave.

I Wonder Why...

Why does Brooks Simpson say that Rebel Bill is scared because he posts under a screen name, but then embraces Thelibertylamp, who also posts under a screen name?

========

Thelibertylamp, btw, has a syndicalist avatar. Syndicalism, basically, is communism. Do you suppose that means Thelibertylamp and his good friend Brooks D. Simpson, approve of the killing of 85 million to 100 million human beings by communists in the 20th Century?

========

Does Brooks D. Simpson want to destroy private property rights in order to stop the VaFlaggers I-95 Flag project? Is that why he has cozied up to the commie Thelibertylamp, who has written,
"Well, they should be scared of us, we win at this game, always have and always will. We would like to help put a stop to this flag going up, but we need a little assistance."
And how is Thelibertylamp planning to win this one? What commie leader's "winning" strategy will he follow? Stalin's? Mao's? Che's? Pol Pot's?

========

Why has Brooks D. Simpson repeatedly mocked and ridiculed Susan Hathaway's faith? Is he anti-Christian, along with being anti-Southern?

========

Why does Brooks D. Simpson demand that others repudiate "white supremacy" when he lives a blindingly white life?

========

Why does Brooks D. Simpson keep bringing up Rob Walker when that issue was long ago explained and resolved? Does he just enjoy harassing and persecuting The Flaggers and he thinks babbling about Walker will do it?

========

Why does Brooks D. Simpson keep bringing up Carl Roden's fan fiction? What has that got to do with civil war blogging? Is it just another facet of Simpson's oft-exhibited desire to denigrate and hurt people for no good reason?

========

Why did Brooks D. Simpson grouse about Susan Hathaway's apparel? Why the harassment and rancor over something so insignificant, and none of his business, anyway?

========

And now, to change horses in mid-stream, why did Andy Hall say,
"Not long ago a member on SHPG showed up and commented on “coon” King and talked about how he celebrated when MLK 'got popped.' He was admonished for posting that comment there, but not asked to leave, or removed,"
when, in fact, the poster certainly was removed shortly after his offending post?  His last comment to show up in the thread is time stamped August 10, 7:47 a.m and, as recounted HERE, I determined by 11:57 the same day, that the poster had been removed from the group.

Doesn't Andy check these accusations of his? Doesn't he try to follow up? I found out the whole situation in less than four hours. But will he acknowledge that the group canned this guy?  Of course not. He gave poor Paula Deen down the country about racial discrimination against her employees. Turned out to not be true, but has he acknowledged that on his blog? Not the last time I checked.

Why do the floggers focus myopically and continuously on one or a mere handful of people who say bad things, but totally ignore the huge number of heritage folks who do not say them, but simply honor their ancestors?

Where does all this animosity that these floggers and their floggerettes exhibit come from? Any guesses, dear readers?

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

How to Assess Gooey Glibness

Or, Brooks D. Simpson -- The Master of Glib

(Sorry, folks. I couldn't stop myself.)

Simpson's jaw-dropping repertoire in the department of telling untruths about Southern heritage advocates runs the gamut -- the outright lie, the spin, the slant, the distortion, the innuendo, the misdirection, the separation from context to change meaning, etc. etc. etc., and so on and so forth....

Let's look at just one example:
"... Matthew Heimbach continued chatting away on the Flaggers’ own FB page (most recently in May 2013) with no one expressing any opposition to his views."
This is presented as irrefutable evidence of the "embracing" of Heimbach by the VaFlaggers. But when you look through the glib and see how this charge compares with measurable reality of Heimbach's posts, you begin to see the ratio of fact to slime in Simpson's artful deceits.
=======
Per Dictionary.com:

chatting
chat
verb (used without object), chat·ted, chat·ting.

1. to converse in a familiar or informal manner.
2. Digital Technology .
  a. to participate with others, through the Internet, in a real-time conversation in a chat room by typing one's contributions to the topics under discussion on one's computer and reading others' typed contributions on one's screen.
 --------------------------------
away
adverb
continuously: laughing away; fire away
=======
So Simpson is conveying the notion that Heimbach chatted continuously on the Flagger Facebook page.

Reality? From the time he was added to the group in September 2012, until May 2013 -- eight months -- Heimbach made four posts on the group.

Four.

FOUR POST IN EIGHT MONTHS.

One on September 11, 2012.
One on November 4, 2012
One on May 1, 2013
One on May 2, 2013

FOUR POST IN EIGHT MONTHS.

 All four of them together comprise 78 words.

SEVENTY-EIGHT WORDS IN EIGHT MONTHS.

See them for yourself: http://www.facebook.com/groups/ConfederataeFlaggers/

Who among you Flagger-haters and Simpson-lovers would honestly and sincerely see that as continuous chatting?

Who of you with integrity would see this as strong and legitimate evidence of the Virginia Flaggers "embracing" Heimbach?

Which brings me to another flogger distortion.  The term "embracing" which Simpson (and others) have used repeatedly to describe the relationship of the Virginia Flaggers to Matt Heimbach.
=======
Again, from Dictionary.com

em·brace
verb (used with object)

1. to take or clasp in the arms; press to the bosom; hug.
2. to take or receive gladly or eagerly; accept willingly: to embrace an idea.
3. to avail oneself of: to embrace an opportunity.
4. to adopt (a profession, a religion, etc.): to embrace Buddhism.
5. to take in with the eye or the mind.

Synonyms
2. adopt, espouse, welcome. 3. seize. 7. comprise, cover, embody. See include.
=======
Even if you stick strictly with the synonyms, "accept," or "include," the VaFlagger response to Heimbach seems to be mostly indifference. I suspect that, until the great gusts of Flogger preoccupation with Heimbach on their blogs, most VaFlaggers weren't aware of his existence.

To reiterate: When you look at this charge  "... Matthew Heimbach continued chatting away on the Flaggers’ own FB page (most recently in May 2013) with no one expressing any opposition to his views," which is supposed to be rock-solid evidence of the "embracing" of Heimbach by the Flaggers ... and when you compare it to the reality of Heimbach's posts, you see the startling ratio of fact to goo in Simpson's artful allegation.

This ought to give pause to any Simpson cheerleader with an ounce of integrity. Consider it Lesson One in  how to realistically assess Simpson's gooey, expert-level glibness.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

To Correct Disinformation...

... being perpetrated in various parts of cyberspace:

I want to address an issue providing floggers and floggerettes an excuse for the vicious attacks on the VaFlaggers.

The Matthew Heimbach Furor

The attempt by Brooks D. Simpson, professor of history at Arizona State University, Andy Hall, Kevin Levin, and others to smear the Virginia Flaggers, and particularly Susan Hathaway, with charges of white supremacy, is reprehensible. When you cut through all the crap, see past all the window dressing, get down to the nitty-gritty and focus on  just the connection between Heimbach and the Flaggers, here's what you find:
(A) Heimbach attended an event that the Flaggers also attended (a heritage rally) and is seen in several photos with them at the event, which are posted online.

(B)  Heimbach posted four (f-o-u-r, 4, four) comments on the Confederate Flagger Facebook page (700+ members), over a period of almost 12 months.

(C) Flagger Tripp Lewis described Matt as a good guy who honored his ancestors.

(D) Heimbach's name was included on a list of people identified as Flaggers who received recognition from the SCV.
I have described these four circumstances as "an incidental, gossamer 'connection' that the floggers are attempting to morph into the anchor chain of the Emma Maersk." And so they are. They are embedding these facts into pages and pages of immaterial commentary, irrelevant images, ugly speculation, and outright untruths. They may (or may not) accurately convey to us information about Matt Heimbach, but they do not alter the facts of an incidental, basically fabricated, "connection" to the Flaggers. These four items simply are not enough to substantiate that Matt Heimbach is a Virginia Flagger.  Here's why:
1. The event where he was photographed with them was not a Virginia Flaggers event. It was a heritage rally. There were other groups and individuals in attendance. Any of them might have had their picture made with the Flaggers that day. That does not make them a Flagger.

2. None of Heimbach's four posts in the Confederate Flaggers Facebook group, which stretched out for almost a year, were about flagging or the Virginia Flaggers.

3. Tripp's description of Matt is not an official Virginia Flagger position. It is his personal opinion and in any case, nothing about it celebrates or agrees with white supremacy.

4. Although the floggers have made a big deal out of Heimbach's name on a list of Flaggers recognized by the SCV as some major proof of the Flaggers "embracing" Heimbach, circumstances make it much more likely that his inclusion on the list was simply a mistake. 
What circumstances? Flaggings. What makes one a Flagger is ... flagging.

Since September 2011, the number of times the Flaggers have flagged the VMFA -- >100 
  
Since September 2011, the number of times Matt Heimbach has flagged the VMFA with them -- 0

Matthew Heimback is not a Virginia Flagger. 
 
I find it simply unfathomable why anyone would attempt, with such dedication and glee, to portray good, decent people the way these floggers are trying to portray the Virginia Flaggers -- or,  if they're as good as they like to appear, why they'd even want to.
________________________________

Other disinformation and/or misconceptions to set straight.

1. I am not the webmaster for the Virginia Flaggers.

They do not have a website, so no webmaster is needed. They do have a blog, and I routinely upload content they email me to the blog host (Blogger).

Back in April or so, Susan Hathaway contacted me to ask for information about setting up a blog on Blogger (which hosts all my blogs). I advised her of some things I had learned working with Blogger, and offered my help to set up a blog for the Virginia Flaggers.  Knowing how busy she is, I also offered to upload blog posts and monitor comments once the blog went live.

I have uploaded quite a number of blog entries since then, but others have also added content. All the posts I have added are identified with my name.

None of the content originates with me and never has, with the exception of the first post (the Welcome post) and the composition of post titles when posts come to me (via email) without one. Since post titles comprise the blog index, I compose the title based on the content.

2. I am not a spokesperson for the Virginia Flaggers.

Susan Hathaway's statement that she leaves the "heavy hitting" to me was simply a jocular Facebook acknowledgement that (a) she doesn't read blog entries, Facebook posts, Tweets, etc., from critics and attackers and (b) she knows that I not only read them, but defend or counter-attack.

Why Brooks Simpson, presumably an intelligent, educated adult, would attempt to give this frivolity serious significance is mystifying. In fact, why he, Andy Hall, Kevin Levin and their followers would pay any attention at all to Southern heritage groups on Facebook and heritage activists like the Virginia Flaggers is itself a mystery.

My posts at Backsass, all my other blogs and websites, and on Facebook, Twitter and anywhere else, are my own. Unless otherwise noted, I am always speaking for myself only. Nobody else.

3. I am not a part of the Virginia Flaggers organization.

I enthusiastically support their mission, and I've offered to assist them in whatever ways I can, but I am not a Virginia Flagger.  I live in Florida, about 900 miles from Richmond, and I have limited contact with them. If memory serves, I have had about three short telephone conversations with Susan; other than that, my contact with the group has been via text messages delivered by email and messaging.

* * *
A Facebook friend recently suggested to me that since I support the Flaggers, some of the content on my blog(s) could possibly result in attempts by some to damage the Flaggers by association. I dismissed that idea at first, but after seeing what has happened the past few days, I suspect my friend was right.

In his vicious attacks on the Flaggers of late, Brooks Simpson has included numerous references to me. Many of the things he has said are not true (i.e., claims that I am a spokesperson or mouthpiece for the Flaggers, that I am the group's webmaster, that my graphic memes involve racism and hatred that reflects on the Flaggers, etc.) But it does appear that Simpson's attacks on the Flaggers are motivated partly, or exacerbated, by anger at me. Therefore, it behooves me to remove myself as that motivation.

So I'm going to try  ... TRY ... to scale back on defense and counter-attack in my writings when they involve critics and attackers targeting the Virginia Flaggers.

I said ... I'll try.

Best Laid Plans....




Monday, September 2, 2013

Discerning Differences....

Isn't that what "diversity" is all about? 

For those having difficulty with this concept, though, let me convey to you that The Sons of Confederate Veterans and the Virginia Flaggers are not the same organization. They are two (2) t-w-o different organizations.  Separate. Different. Not the same.

Capisce?

Good.

The Transparency of Kevin Levin

Can see right through him....
From his blog post titled, Who Are the Virginia Flaggers?
Levin: What the major news channels have not done, however, is look into the membership of the Flaggers and whether their talk of Confederate heritage reflects the broader values of the Richmond community.
So? Does every-freaking-thing that happens in Richmond "reflect the broader values" of the Richmond community? I'll bet you lots and lots of stuff happens that doesn't "reflect the broader values" of the Richmond community. And it doesn't have to. That's DIVERSITY!!!
Levin: Thanks to Brooks Simpson (and here) and Andy Hall we are learning more about individual members (or individuals who are claimed as members by the Flaggers) such as Matthew Heimbach.
No, you aren't learning about memberS or individualS, plural. You've read a few things about one (1) guy.
Levin: Susan Hathaway and the rest of the Flaggers have gone on record attacking prominent members of Richmond’s history and museum community for their supposed Confederate heritage betrayals. The Virginia Flaggers should be held accountable to the very same standard. Richmonders should ask themselves whether Matthew Heimbach’s view of Confederate heritage represents their own.
What standard. WHAT FLIPPIN' STANDARD? The Flaggers are not paid with taxpayer money to sabotage and distort the very work they're supposed to be doing.  Why should Heimbach's view represent any person's view in Richmond? Or anywhere else? THEY ARE HIS VIEWS.  I know that's hard for people with group-think mentalities to process, BUT NOT EVERYONE SEES EVERYTHING THE SAME WAY, even though political correctness and left-think demands it.

Lookit, Levin, you can bray to the Richmond media all you want, but except for a relative handful of folks on the left, the I-95 flag is way down most folks' list of priorities. 
Levin: ....but as they have emerged in the public’s eye they should expect increased scrutiny when questions are left unanswered or intentionally ignored.
Well, that depends on how important the questions are, and who is asking them.
Levin  Richmonders have an interest in knowing who is donating money and who is working behind the scenes to make this happen.
No they don't. Private group, private donations -- or do you think all private groups and donations should b blabbed all over the media?  THIS IS A PHONY, MADE UP ISSUE.
Levin: Until then, the Virginia Flaggers’ claims to defending any kind of heritage is bunk. 
Horse muffins. First, they haven't said any thing about defending heritage. The flaggings and the I-95 flag, are to commemorate soldiers who fought and died for Virginia.  Who's donating to the project has absolutely no bearing on commemoration of Confederate soldiers. 

Levin is so het up about the I-95 flag, he's been tweeting up a frenzy to the Richmond media. But the big, puffy-chested, self-styled "anti-racist" encounters an American Indian woman who is pissed that he ignores the "racism" of sports team names... Look what happens. Pay special attention to how he answer her::


"Ees not my chob, man. I do the civil war."
 

I have no idea what you're talking about. 
I've never even HEARD heard of the Washington Redskins. 
But look how this Confederate flag is being used.....

LOL!