Friday, June 21, 2013

Corey Meyer Supports White Genocide

(See note at end of article.)

I didn't hear Michael Cushman's speech at the League of the South convention earlier this month, so I can't speak with certainty about whether Corey Meyer's report on it is accurate. But knowing of Corey's years long animosity for white Southerners and knowing his long track record for lying about us, I don't put nuch stock it in his blog post.

For example, he puts his antipathy on display right at the beginning with the phrase "neo-confederate love fest" to describe the convention, so why would any objective reader muddle through his "report" with anything but complete skepticism?

I'm not concerned with some of what Corey wrote (his claims of historical inaccuracies in the speech, and Michael's interest in the Golden Circle) but Corey's response to Michael's claims of the genociding of Southern whites is somewhat puzzling.  Although he uses irony quotes around "genocide", as if he doesn't believe it, he doesn't do much to challenge Cushman's claim.

Maybe Corey is unaware of current demographic realities in the United States -- or maybe he is, and just doesn't care. Michael focuses on the replacement of white Southerners because the South is what he's interested in, but the fact is, white people throughout the United States are being replaced deliberately, as a result of several factors, confirmed just days ago by the Census Bureau.

Reports in Slate, the Washington Post and other media outlets focused on the Census Bureau's announcement that for the first time in the history of the United States, white deaths outnumber white births.

Right now, the margin is small -- a decrease of 12,400 out of 198 million non-Hispanic whites. But that's not a blip, not a temporary anomaly, and it will get worse with time, for the reasons pointed out in the article. Eventually, white people will completely disappear in the USA.

The Slate article touches on a few factors pertinent to this change -- for example, white women are more likely to be childless, especially college educated ones -- but the article fails to mention that this is a direct result of the feminist-pushed and government-assisted agenda of childlessness through birth control -- and especially the feminist sacrament of abortion. Thereplacing of whites by nonwhites is also the inevitable result of the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act

If you want to see what the United States will look like before long, take a look at California, which is a minority-majority state. Once the "Golden State" of promise and prosperity, it is has been caught between liberal policies that are bankrupting town after town, and the costs of massive illegal immigration. The state itself is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.

Californians in record numbers are fleeing the state for points east. The rich, celebrity cities along the coast are doing okay for now, but areas of the state like the Central Valley are becoming unrecognizable.

Corey defines third-world immigration as "non-white" but "third world" means so much more than people's melanin content, as California's Central Valley demonstrates. You won't hear about it from the mainstream media, because the media is a leftist enterprise dedicated to the socialist policies bringing about the country's decline/demise. But Victor Davis Hanson, who lives there, has written about it extensively, and it ain't pretty. Google his name and start reading..

In one article, Hansen notes that California "... has the highest sales and income taxes, the most lavish entitlements, the near-worst public schools (based on federal test scores), and the largest number of illegal aliens in the nation, along with an overregulated private sector, a stagnant and shrinking manufacturing base, and an elite environmental ethos that restricts commerce and productivity without curbing consumption."

Federal water policy has taken thousands of prime agricultural acres out of production, creating massive unemployment.  Hansen notes, "Many of the rural trailer-house compounds I saw appear to the naked eye no different from what I have seen in the Third World. There is a Caribbean look to the junked cars, electric wires crisscrossing between various outbuildings, plastic tarps substituting for replacement shingles, lean-tos cobbled together as auxiliary housing, pit bulls unleashed, and geese, goats, and chickens roaming around the yards. The public hears about all sorts of tough California regulations that stymie business — rigid zoning laws, strict building codes, constant inspections — but apparently none of that applies out here."

Read the whole thing. Take a look, America. This is what you're becoming. It's just happening more slowly in other states.

Corey ends his muddled analysis by posting a graphic I made for Facebook and reposted here at Backsass,
and follows it with this:
Is what Connie says racist…if the ends are speeches like Michael Cushman’s at the Florida League of the South…then yes…it is.
Ah, no, it isn't, Corey.  My graphic is correct -- there is nothing bad about or wrong with the things I listed. But since you apparently think that Cushman is wrong to be concerned about the replacement of white Southerners, that means you're okay with the long, gradual, drawn-out genocide of white Southerners. But, of course, wishing for the extinction of white people, or just being blase about it, isn't racist, LOL.

Just remember, Corey, it isn't only in the South where white people are being replaced. It's the whole country.

Which logically leads to this:

Granted, I can't prove this is how it will be in the future USA (and thankfully, I won't be around to see it) but all you have to do is look at what's happening in other once white nations who are succumbing to the inevitable outcome of "multiculturalism" -- the genocide of white people.

And just using South Africa as an example, we can see that my graphic is coming true before our very eyes.  Whites in South Africa are being brutally and horribly murdered continuously. But black on black murder has skyrocketed, as well. Most blacks are worse off under the ANC than they were under apartheid (except, of course, for those IN the ANC). 

Whites in Europe are also reproducing at below replacement levels, thanks to socialist policies like feminism and abortion, and the massive rejection of Christianity. Their nonwhite replacements are African and Arab Muslims instead of illegal aliens form Mexico and legal immigrants from nearly any place but a white place, as is the case in the USA... but the result will be the same.

There are some signs that Europeans are waking up. News is leaking out that in Sweden (the rape capital of the world, and it ain't white Swedish men doing the raping), natives are starting to fight back against the savagery of immigrant behavior.

France, as well, is starting to show some backbone against socialism and Islamic immigration that has been replacing French people in their own land. Recently there was a march against gay marriage in France. Several months ago, young French people calling themselves Generation Identity stormed the mosque at Poitiers and demanded no more mosque building in France, and no more Muslim immigration. And the French government is finally catching up. News reports a few days ago say that it will to cut benefits to immigrants by 83%.

Even Britain's passivity under the Islamic onslaught might be on the verge of changing since the gruesome spectacle of Lee Rigby being hacked to death and in broad daylight in the middle of a town street by remorseless Muslims savages. 

Of course, it remains to be seen whether Europe's "awakening" is too little, too late. And we don't know whether Corey and others evilizers of Southern whites who shrug at the coming replacement (genocide) of whites in America, and thus in the South, also shrug at the replacement of Europeans in their own countries by African and Middle Eastern Islamics.

I guess for white multiculturalists, it's better to die along with everyone else in their demographic, than to decry it and show themselves to be racists.
Note: Nowhere in his blog post does Corey come out and state that he is FOR white genocide. But then, Corey and his flogger buddies have repeatedly accused me, by outright statements or hints and innuendo, of supporting things I've never supported, or even hinted that I support, based solely on their deliberate misreading of things I've said. Sometimes the insinuations are based on nothing but flogger bigotry against proSoutherners in general, and me in particular. So I'm making this observation about Corey based on flogger methods and history. And, to use the Simpson and Followers methods, I'm saying Corey does support the wiping of white people off the face of the earth -- unless he comes and states in MY BLOG COMMENTS that he doesn't.

This is known as Turn About Is Fair Play.


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. Nope, Corey. I didn't see or watch (or view or observe or gaze at or eyeball or have a look-see) the video.

    Did you not read or peruse my post? Are you blind? It TELLS you why white women are not having as many babies -- because the left has been pushing feminism on the most populous segment of the country for several generations. If white people started advocating raising the white birthrate, it would have exactly the same effect as advocating that minorities have fewer children -- screams of racism would absolutely deafen everybody in the country and you know it.

    Genocide doesn't mean just lining people up and shooting them so they fall in ditch graves, Corey. Raphael Lemkin coined the term genocide, and he said:

    “By ‘genocide’ we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing)…. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group”.

    This is happening to white people in the United States (in Europe, as well. Of course the genocide of white people in South Africa is the killing variety, done in a horrific way). The coordinated plan of different actions includes the breakdown of the family, attacks on the religion (Christianity) that forms the moral underpinnings and legal foundation of society, pushing an agenda that reduces the birthrate to below replacement levels, opening the floodgates of both legal and illegal immigration, to name a few.

    It is possible, Corey, to destroy a group without destroying the individuals that comprise the group... However, what's going on in the United States will eventually result in the disappearance of white people. Call it slow-motion genocide.

    I would be majorly surprised if my graphic had anything whatever to do with the planning, writing and delivery of Michael Cushman's speech. You're welcome to try to prove it did; in fact, I'd love to see your proof.

    He probably hasn't even seen it. Since I'm a "Rainbow Confederate" to him, he has little interest in reading anything I write.

    You have a way of claiming that unrelated or unconnected things are associated because YOU associate them in your mind. You need to realize how that makes you look, and get a handle on it.

  4. Speaking of genocide...
    I note that Corey quotes a certain individual on his blog and whereby gets the name for it- "Blood of my Kindred"...

    "It is plain that nothing approaching the present policy will subdue the rebels. Whether we shall find anybody with a sufficient grasp of mind and sufficient moral courage to treat this as a radical revolution and remodel our institutions, I doubt. It would involve the desolation of the South as well as emancipation, and a re-peopling of half the continent. This ought to be done, but it startles most men."

    -Thaddeus Stevens, September 5, 1862

    "Mr. Thaddeus Stevens, Chairman of the Committee of Ways and Means, who by virtue of that position is the Ministerial leader, is clear-headed, methodical and logical; but he drawls and drones, and is utterly without animation of manner or elegance of diction. He speaks like a cold and callous theorist, who would carry out, if he could, his idea of Southern extermination with as little compunction as he would erase a wrong word in a sentence."

    "My Bloody Kindred" would be more appropriate.

  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

  6. Corey, your question to BR is irrelevant to this discussion.

  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

  8. This comment has been removed by the author.


Comments are welcome, but monitored.