But it isn't just Simpson. Several members of his floggerette peanut gallery are consummate liars. The one I want to focus on now is Liberty Lamprey, who recently posted:
What is it with these people and their obsessions with “rape”? They advocate it, they defend it and then accuse others of doing it.Let's deconstruct this to determine exactly which parts of it are lies.
Is it me, or are there some weird sexual power issues with the Confed fantasy crowd?
Backass has nothing against rape, in fact it is something her “sweet WHITE southern boys” have the right to do. She not only writes propaganda articles to support them to rape, but has a self published trash novel where she also gets to advocate their right to rape and plug her warped swamp rat racism and hatred.
Lamprey begins: What is it with these people...
I'm not sure who "these people" are that s/he's talking about, although s/he obviously includes me. I can't speak for whoever else s/he has in mind, but I can and do speak for myself.
LIE: ...and their obsessions with “rape”? (Whether these quotes are scare quotes or irony quotes, this is a lie.)
LIE: They advocate it...
LIE: ... then accuse others of doing it.
Lamprey then asks, "Is it me, or are there some weird sexual power issues with the Confed fantasy crowd?" It's just you, dude. Or dude-ette, whichever you are. Maybe your death fetish interferes with your perceiving things accurately.
LIE: Backass (sic) has nothing against rape... S/He may think the intentional misspelling of the name of my blog is cute but it's really just petty and childish, like so much else s/he writes.
LIE: ... in fact it is something her “sweet WHITE southern boys” have the right to do.
LIE: She not only writes propaganda articles to support them to rape...
LIE ...but has a self published trash novel where she also gets to advocate their right to rape...
LIE: ...and plug her warped swamp rat racism and hatred.
* * *
I don't have a lot of money, or any material thing of great value I could offer as a reward to any one for finding proof of any of what Lamprey's claiming. Of course, since I never said/claimed/suggested anything s/he's accusing here, nobody would win the reward, even if I had it to offer.
My blog has a search function. You can also search it with Google using this format in the address bar: search-term site:http://mybacksass.blogspot.com For example:
Other search terms might include "false rape" or "false accusation." But whatever term you use, you will not not find where I have advocated rape, or where I have claimed it is something “sweet WHITE southern boys” -- or any one else -- has the right to do.
Of course, Lamprey isn't going to use the search function. No flogger or floggerette will do it, because they don't want to be confronted with the truth -- which is, Lamprey is lying about this.
Apparently, people like Liberty Lamprey, Simpson and others of their ilk, have difficulty distinguishing between rape and not-rape. They have difficulty distinguishing between rape, and a false accusation of rape. I'm not sure why they should have such difficulty... I'm sure they can tell the difference between theft and a false accusation of theft, or between cheating on a test, and a false accusation of cheating on a test. And presumably, they would not approve of accusing somebody of cheating on a test who, in fact, did not cheat. Presumably, they would not approve of accusing somebody of theft who, in fact, has not stolen anything.
But accusing a man of rape he hasn't committed is apparently okay with them. And if they are okay with that, are they also okay with an innocent man spending 30 years in prison for a rape he did not commit?
I do not support sending innocent men to prison, just as I do not support letting rapists go unpunished. The difference between me and the floggers and their followers, apparently, is that I distinguish between rapists and innocent men.