Like established floggers, he appears to be on an online quest to find smear-quality fecal matter, an activity that results in his faulty reading comprehension, or renders him either incapable of, or disinterested in, truth and accuracy. Just like a real flogger!
As I've already discussed, he's dubbed me a P.I. for my perspicuity in clicking a link at Amazon and finding out that fake reviewer named None of your business is Brooks Simpson.
His latest post about little ol' moi is titled, "Connie Chastain, League of the South member?"
He starts off the discussion with a link to my blog post, Violence, Violence, Vi-hi-hi-o-ho-ho-leh-heh-hence, although there's nothing in that post to indicate I'm a member of the League. Presumably, SpeLUNKer thinks that if you communicate with someone by FB messenger, you are both members of the same groups. Or maybe you share membership on groups if you converse in a civil manner...
Truth told, I'm not sure what his point is.
Next, he posts a screenshot of a post I made on the League's Facebook Page (before I was kicked off, meaning it was in the summer of 2012), wherein I answer the question, "Are you a League member, Connie?" with this: " Not at present. I have been about two or three times in the past."
Beneath the screenshot, SpeLUNKer sez, "I think we get it. Nuff said."
Get what? I wasn't a member at the time I made that post. Lessee.... I sent Dr. Hill a letter of resignation (or maybe a non-renewal, if memory serves) in early 2005.....And as my Backsass posts objecting to the League's new direction indicate, I'm not a member now.
Moving along, he segues into vi-hi-hi-o-ho-ho-leh-heh-hence by referencing my post relating Simpson's "rampaging about imaginary violence." Sez the Big LUNK, "I think it goes without saying that though the League's track record has been one of no acts of violence committed so far...."
Never having committed violence is a dead giveaway of violent intentions, don'tcha know....
He continues, "...they are certainly expressing enough potentially violent rhetoric publicly for people to be concerned."
And with that pronouncement, he links to the massive amount of potentially violent rhetoric.... one post on the League's website, A Bazooka in Every Pot
In that article, Dr. Hill discusses the nature of Fourth Generation (4Gen) Warfare -- i.e. guerrilla warfare. The article was written about how citizens could defend themselves against an increasingly hostile -- and chillingly, massively armed -- government killing machine (my words, not Dr. Hill's). We know from witnessing it (Waco, Ruby Ridge) how efficient the feds can be at warring on the very citizens the government was created to protect. It's even worse now, when local law enforcement is getting into combat mode (complete with military clothes, tanks, grenades, etc) with their shoot-first, ask-questions-later mentality.
So Dr. Hill discussed a hypothetical guerrilla war and the libs go crazy, and SpeLUNKER sez that article is a "cat ready to pounce."
Frankly, I've read a lot worse from understandably paranoid rightwingers with no secessionist or breakaway nationalistic ambitions. And if it ever comes to that kind of fight, Southern nationalists will make up a small fraction of the overall number of people fighting against government tyranny.
He continues, "Just because it hasn't happened yet, does not mean there's no reason for concern."
My thoughts exactly, but in relation to the feds, the jihadists, the immigrant invastion... There's plenty of reason for concern.
But then it gets really good when SpeLUNKer goes off on flights of fancy that will spin your head. Sez he:
"Why doesn't some one in the media ask Michael Hill how he plans to move all of the non-Whites out of the South once the ethnostate is created? You know, all of the ones who don't self deport after they are stripped of their Civil Rights and the 'Welfare State' is eradicated. I'm sure it's going to be a pretty peaceful process."
I have not seen where the League is calling for an "ethnostate," having searched both websites for the term unsuccessfully. What Spelunker links to is not a League site, it is a personal blog. I can find nothing in League material advocating for moving non-whites out of the South. I notice Mr. Lunker doesn't have an embedded link to that.
Apparently, Mr. Lunker and I have very different views of what violence is. He apparently thinks shoving, yelling, maybe some cussing is violent. I think punching, kicking, stabbing, slicing is, among other things, violent.
These videos will highlight some of the differences. (My apologies for the filthy language.)
Spelunker's concept of violence.
My concept of violence.
Remember this, folks. It's the bottom line:
"I think it goes without saying that ... the League's track record has been one of no acts of violence committed ...." ~SpeLUNKer