Mousy TongueShe must be using the liberal concept of trivializing. What the rest of the world understands as trivializing is this:
December 18, 2014 at 10:53 am
Chastain is actively trivializing Lilly Baumann’s tragedy, using poor arguments to claim she is presumably safe.
to make trivial; cause to appear trifling, of very little importance or value; insignificant.
Well, of course, my pointing out the fact that the media reported that the little girl is with her mother doesn't trivialize anything. It is simply the truth. Would Mousy have us believe Lilly would be just as safe if she'd been kidnapped by a modern day Richard Hauptmann? Is she for real?
She is in fact campaigning against concern for the missing girl.Ah, no. I'm rejecting the despicable implication that the Virginia Flaggers are involved in, associated with, have knowledge of (beyond news reports) or are in some way responsible for the kidnapping.
Brooks D. Simpson
December 18, 2014 at 11:51 am
Chastain simply doesn’t give a damn about Lilly Baumann.First, my understanding is that the little girl's name is Lilly Everett. I could be wrong, but that's my understanding.
Second, I give as much d--- about her as I do the 260,000+ OTHER kids who are abducted every year in the US. Obviously, she is the only one Simpson gives a d--- about.
Neither do the Virginia Flaggers.Which brings us to the reason why Brooks Simpson, hypocritus monumentalus, gives a d--- about Lilly... She is a weapon to use against the VaFlaggers. Beyond that, what evidence to we have that he gives a d--- about her? Have you ever seen him express his "concern" about her in a post that doesn't attack the Flaggers and imply that they are involved in, associated with, have knowledge of the kidnapping?